Wednesday, July 30, 2014

ISLAM BASHING BY AMERICAN SPEAKING “ENLIGHTENED BEINGS”


[Edited on 14th August 2014]


This article was originally prepared to address some questions posted on Ojay Khoo's Facebook page.

Commentators therein were on Islam bashing frenzy. They tie every crime acted by any individual or group with a Muslim name as something procured by Islam and even fabricate that these acts are stated in the Quran. 

Like many others, Ojay Khoo is agent provocateur whom puts up half truth articles and images and enjoys the audience's exchange. The particular page that drew my attention was dated 27th July ’14 – making fun of MAS stewardess on Burqah. 





Having read the persistent vitriol by many anti-Islam audiences on Ojay Khoo's page, I feel compelled to elaborate their hypocrisy, giving their expert opinion on their moral standings against what they are actually spewing. 5 things idiots believe about Muslims which just aren’t true.

The audience procured and attracted by certain Facebook users are simply overwhelming, seemingly a recruitment of campaign workers for America/Israel. Of late, there has been an onslaught of critism against Islam as a “Religion of Peace” based on the behaviors of some Islamic bodies, leaders, politicians and the violence, killings committed by groups of terrorists with Muslim names. I can’t help to take notice of the intensity of vitriol lodged by certain groups, aimlessly. They craft the questions in such a manner to instigate their audience to jump into the bandwagon of “Islam bashing”, which I though is best addressed here. 


DISCLAIMER: This article is targeted to selected "experts" @ "Enlightened Beings" also known as "Muslim haters" with some sarcasm by yours truly and to whom I have named in the Labels below and not at all intended to hurt the billions of learned, understanding and compassionate non-Muslim around the world, my friends, teachers, doctors, employers, neighbors or acquaintances. Strictly for racist retards.

1. Hypocrites

Hypocrisy, is the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. And I’m not talking about the selected criminals with Muslim names or their frequent visits to the local SPA, or the last trip to Thailand or the collections of porn video on their computer. I’m talking about the apparent mind set of many non-Muslim Malaysians, whom I shall name as “Enlightened Beings”.

First some basic data. There are 7 billion people on planet earth. Out of which 2 billion are Muslims. 50% of these “Muslims” are in the African continents and another 30% are in Asia. On the overall, earth is inhabited by human beings with various religion where 32% are Christians, Muslims 22%, Hindus 13%, Chinese Folk 6.4%, Sikhs 0.3%, Jews 0.2%, and others. Surprisingly China has over 60 million Muslims. The 13% Enlightened Beings whom either have worked/studied in the West or any Mat Salleh country, associate themselves as a “Western” educated, tend to have a sudden elevated Western opinions when comes to religion and lifestyle. They thrive only on social networks like Fb but hide their tail behind the legs when out in the open - and kiss Muhyiddin’s hand.

Christians growth since the Barbarian crusaders has stagnated globally while Islam's numbers have almost doubled, according to one researcher. In a report by Dick Slikker, of the Christian mission consultancy group Project Care, Christians made up 34.5 per cent of the world's population in 1900, while in 2010 they were 32.9 per cent. Dropped!

2. The 72 Houris

The Enlightened Beings, will continue to mislead, twist, turn, flip, somersaults with triple twist every bit of information about a Muslim and persistently, elaborately, instigate their Fb audience, that our prophet is a pedophile or we Muslims kill each other for the 72 houris, or Muslims are sheepshaggers or something that they can grab onto without knowing the background of it. They refuse to process pass their mental faculties that these being ancient paradigms of the early Arabs crusaders and today in the year 2014 there is no war of religion and as such Jihad and 72 houris does not apply. Yet they will quote all and any criminals, terrorism and wars carried out by one with a Muslim name and elaborately associate Islam into it and insist their actions to be concurrent to the Quran, as if they have read it.

Another true Muslim, Rose Karim - Embleton took the trouble to refute the “Enlightened Beings” of their spinning on 72 houris. Rose wrote, “That 72 VIRGINs WAITING FOR YOU IN HEAVEN story is totally made up and non-existent in the text of the Quran.

These people who quote that use an incorrect translation of a Hadith narrated as such, but even in the wording of that Hadith it talks about 72 Huors (not virgins); where a Huor (Arabic word) is the intense blackness of the eyes, meaning these are heavenly creatures with prominent black eyes, and in no instance is this term associated with virginity nor does it have sexual connotations. Nor does that Hadith say Huors are only females - it do not say that.

Al-Albani is not one of the reliable sources of Hadith because he contradict himself at times, even Saudi Arabian scholars distanced themselves from him even though they are both so called Salafi.

Just because there is a bad translation of the Hadith does not mean there is a problem with the Hadith, read it in its original language, it does not say virgins at all. And the people who insist on projecting it otherwise in a sexual connotations are simply sick perverts who have nothing better to do.

They have no right to tell Muslims what and what not to believe. And to do so is to contradict the freedom of religion they reserve for themselves, and deny others by their constant defamation and attacks on basic Islamic beliefs. And in their desperate attempt to discredit the message of Islam, what better way than attack the teachings Messenger.

In the original Arabic text of the Quran there is no reference to the word "Virgin" (Athra in Arabic) except in reference to Virgin Mary.

Don't believe those who call all Hadith corrupted as many Hadiths have strong chain of reference, and some have been proven scientifically true. But there are also many weak Hadiths which Muslims just take as face value, if we find they contradict the Quran or other strong Hadiths then we reject them. But we have no reason to reject any strong chain Hadith if it does not disagree with Quran or other Hadiths that have been authenticated.


The 72 virgins was a fake man-made fabricated Hadith to go against Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) for political reasons."

[Click here for WikiIslam authentication]


3. Muslims Are Terrorist

The apparent is (to most of us) is that planet earth is populated by a cocktail of religious, cultural and political beliefs, about 1% are in control of the 89%, by using some 10% of retards from the sick and demagogues committing murders, torture, rape, terrorism, child molestation, human trafficking, human mutilation and more unthinkable crimes for any reasons out of their twisted mind. They go by many names like Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Tamil Elam, Boko Haram, French Revo, Kamikaze Warriors, Sicarii Zealots, Ku Klux Klan, Russian Tsar, NAZI, Khalistan, Fenian Brotherhood, Irish Republic, Hezbollah, HAMAS, Mikhail Bakumin, Eric Moletata, Mafia, RAF Columbia, Kurdistan, Ba’ath Party, Abu Sayyaf, Sulu, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Alpha 66 and Omega 7, Army of God, Aryan Nations, Black Liberation Army, The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the Lord, Earth Liberation Front, Jewish Defense League, Israel Defense Forces, May 19th Communist Organization, The Order, Phineas Priesthood, Tausug, Symbionese Liberation Army, United Freedom Front, Weathermen and not to forget the illusive “CIA”.

But no, Enlightened Beings; propagated by Western media will help to handpick, dust off, the crimes committed by a criminals with a Muslim name and sensationalize it on Facebook – preaching how great was their religion. Instead these Enlightened Beings will call Muslims “Barbarians” without even realizing where did the term/name Barbarians originated from.

4. "Allah'u Akhbar"

Having explained that, Enlightened Beings will then produce the “Allah'u Akhbar” thing. Where criminals utter “AllahuAkhbar” while committing crimes and as such, Islam is bad because it endorses murder. 


"What!? AllahuAkhar in Arabic simply means “God All Mighty” you @#$% morons. We don’t know if they are asking for forgiveness or blessings". 








In any case there is no secret code, spell or magic encoded in this words that God would automatically grant the criminals 72 houris in the life thereafter for their actions. If so, then we don’t need Police, courts, Syariah Laws, Hudud, Witness, Judges, Punishment, or Prison, simply because when one use the password “AllahuAkhbar”, their crimes are forgiven, blessed and free to walk the surface of the earth. It would be extremely stupid to even think about it, and sickening as the Enlightened Beings capitalize on it. To me for a wrong course, its no different than the rethorics like “Shabbat Shalom”, “Vel-vel”, “Hi-Hitler, “Kalima Shakti the”, "Long Live the Queen" in the name of the “Queen of England”, “long live King Richard”, in the name of “Jesus Christ”, in the name of “Mother Marry” or colonize countries in the name of “civilization” just to fancy their actions. Admiral William Halsey, who became commander of the South Pacific Forces early on during the World War II made famous the slogan “Kill Japs, kill Japs, kill more Japs”, yet no "Enlightened Beings" went ape shit over it. A wrong is a wrong no matter what mambo-jumbo one utters or religion he/she is from.

But nothing beats the cunning, deceptive yet the most effective war slogan ever concocted by the “licensed” terrorists, “War Against Terror” by George Bush Sr. whom killed 1 million people to avenge the 3000 death at WTC (or was it for oil), which had become a primary campaign material for the Enlightened Beings. To me, the criminals can utter any fancy words they like, it does not mean God of any religion will bless their actions. Amongst the many, Noble Laws of Islam does say is that it forbid all forms of attacks on innocents. God Almighty says in the Holy Qur’an: ‘No bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another’ (Surah al-Isra 17:15). But try explaining these to an Enlightened Beings, they will triple twist their tongue to dodge a straight forward answer.

After which, the Enlightened Beings will add butter and gee to question why Muslims all over the world are not speaking up against such terrorism? And therefore, it must be because Islam is not “Religion of Peace”; conclude the Enlightened Beings. Perhaps if they want, they can catch up with Charles Kurzman’s compilation here (if they want to):  http://kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/

5. Moral Prosecutors

One very disturbed commentator, James Narasimman Naidu posted on his page, on Sunday 27th July 2014 @ 10:29am;

DOES ISLAM NEED A REVAMP? WITH ALL THIS KILLINGS, IT JUST NOT IN ACCORD WITH 'RELIGIOUS' PRINCIPLES OR GOD' PERHAPS THERE IS A DIFFERENT ISLAM, WHICH WE DON"T KNOW ABOUT? Anyone?” wrote James.

James Narasimman (believed to be United Nations President) poses vast wisdom and knowledge in Islamic theories that no one is a match to him. Being a Hindu, James should write and propogate the greatness of the 13% Hinduism instead of spending hours everyday on his Facebook page focusing his paradigm, energies, skills and talents painting Islam and Muslims in the most negative and repulsive manner. Probably this kind of behavior that resulted in the popular phrase If you see a snake and an Indian, kill the Indian. Also, “Don’t bend down in the presence of a Singh or “the only thing straight with a Chinaman is his hair” and “A Chinaman is willing to sell his mother for money”. Don’t get me wrong, it was not me who made these filthy words, it was you the self-proclaimed “Enlightened Being”, the knowledgeable, experts of morality. So, who’s the hypocrite again?

Anyway, to which I would like to reply via the words of a German scholar Pierre Vogel whom responded to public forum on links between Islam and terrorism and he replied them with questions:
  • Who started the First World War?
  • Who started the Second World War?
  • Who is trying to start a Third World War?
  • Who has killed 20 million Australian members?
  • Who throw a nuclear bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima?
  • Who has killed more than 100 million Indians in North America?
  • Who has killed more than 50 million Indians in South America?
  • Who was caught with 180 million Africans, of which 88% died and were thrown into the Atlantic Ocean?
  • Who killed 1 million people to avenge the lives of 3000 in 9/11 WTC acted out by 4 crazy Arabs with box cutters?
Are any one of them from a religion of peace? We need to revamp the mental faculties of James. First of all James need to know the exact definition of these killings as terrorism. When a non-Muslim kills you consider it a criminal act, when a Muslims involved in killing are then called religious principles, Islam, terrorist or barbaric. But your mind completely ignores the term barbaric that you often lodge against a Muslim criminals/terrorist. Are the Barbarians you chose as an example; Muslims?

Always look the same and you will see that who is a terrorist (!?) said Vogel. For James type of mentality, if a Muslim subscribes to this idea, he/she will be considered an "Extremist" and if otherwise, is a Liberal thinking Muslim.

A war, state of armed conflict between different countries or groups will continue as long as there is greed for money and power – armed men kill each other. You will notice, that United States / Israel will most definitely have a stained hand in all of it. They will use anything to have public sympathy for their agenda. The smart ones see through the smoke and make a distinction. The not so smart, will flood his page with more garbage from his mental dustbin. Take listen at some of the scholars who stood up and bothered to explain.
6. "Mohammed is a Pedophile"

Not satisfied yet, Enlightened Beings will then produce “sex” as an issue out from their sleeve. They will not however speak about Lord Krishna’s craving for the 16000 women/girls, that God Shiva had two wives-Ganga and Parwati aka the destroyer, or that Arjun born to Indra as a result of his clandestine adultery with Pandu’s wife, that the three brothers Lakshmanan, Bharatha and Shatrugna born to three wives of King Dasharatha, Jagannath the god enshrined in the famous Hindu temple at Puri whom indulged in sexual orgies in exchange for rice and dal.

About Prophet Mohammed’s (pbuh) marriage with a 6 year old. It was stated that he had a revelation, to bring Aisha home. He met with the parents, explained the revelation and got the parent’s permission. He also explained to Aisha whom at that age understood. The parents say, to take their daughter away from the them the parent, Mohammed (pbuh) will have to marry her. This is a belief/premise/culture/religion acceptable at that time, circa 632AD which modern man cannot comprehend.

So Mohammed (pbuh) married her and took her home at the age of 6 and consummated his marriage when she was 9 years old, not before. Aisha remained with Mohammed (pbuh) for nine years (i.e., till his death). Aisha went on to be a strong and intelligent spokesperson for women, memorized the Quran and taught the women’s rights, duties and positions in Islam. She did not show any symptoms of a pedophile victim as the Muslim haters would love to hear and therefore Muslims accepted that the revelation had a good purpose.

Back then men marry young girls, even Europeans did it and was not regarded as wrong or disgusting. Fit to be married and consummated is determined with them reaching puberty. There was no age system like today to differentiate infant, child, teenager and adults. The reason for Muhammad’s (pbuh) marriage was never known, it remained with Aisha and her parents.


So to the Christians, Hindus, Chinese or Buddha’s whom wish to insult our prophet, explore you own premise and you will find similar if not identical circumstances in yours too. They won’t admit that sex is regarded sacred in Hinduism whom came up with the book on Kamasutra. But they will not hesitate to ridicule others, or make fun of Malays in close-proximity, or will they want to share Gandhi’s bizarre experiments with his 17-year-old grandniece Abha and his 18-year-old grandniece Manu. Never mind about the Chinese, they have the parents’ consent to do it anywhere any time, just don’t forget the condoms. They are used to uttering foul words in the presents of their mothers and fathers, especially when engaged in Mahjong. In fact, they are the ones who frequents massage parlors and overseas “conference” trips. The practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform.

Enlightened Beings also refuse to accept that it was the Muslims whom contributed in the field of Medicine, Sciences, Mathematics, and Cosmology etc. in the early days. But they will praise their Western master sirs whom in fact invented killing machines and colonized other countries to loot their wealth (Spice/Gold/Lumber/Silk/Elephant tusk/Tiger fur/Crocodile leather/Oil/Land/etc.) in the false pretext of creating “civilized society”. Leaving us poor and bankrupt while they went on to live like kings and brag of their advancements.

Therefore, the question on who is the hypocrite dear Enlightened Beings? What kind of religion are you (who spew so much of garbage and hate against Islam and Muslims) are procuring?  

I repeat, that every country today that has some war and conflict that “seems” to have a religious tone to it, you will most definitely find U.S. / Israel’s stained hand somewhere in it.

7. Islam is not Religion of Peace


Couple of days after this article was uploaded, Ojay Khoo shared an image (right) of mistranslated verses of Quran by a Philippine teenager by the name of Jocebel Smith. The adults, the learned and the Enlightened Beings took it word for word of the teenager's posting and appropriately commenced with Islam bashing.

This girl (Jocebel Smith) is pretty good. She should get a raise if employed with CNN or IDF. She did go through the Quran and carefully shortened the words to attract her audience. But nice of her to leave the verse numbers for my cross reference. All the verses she picked is related to some battle in circa 635 AD (The Spoils of War & their repentance). Partly, to counter the 1st Century Old Testament.

These are like the instruction manual during a battle, written almost 2000 years ago, where Arab linguistic is not something man today can’t easily comprehend. Something like Nostradamus prophecies where his quatrains can match almost anything our mind would like to. Therefore it’s not for anyone to translate and market their idea. Yet some have, and used it to fool others.

Anyway, this girl has misquoted a war time advises to suit her intention. The English translation by Sahith International are as follows.

[QS 2:191 And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.]

[QS 9:123 O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous]

[QS 9:5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give Zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.]

[QS 9:29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the Jizyah willingly while they are humbled]

[QS 3:85   And whoever desires other than Islam as religion - never will it be accepted from him, and he, in the Hereafter, will be among the losers.]

[QS 9:30   The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah "; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved (before them). May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?]

[5:33   Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,]

[9:28 O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Haram after this, their [final] year. And if you fear privation, Allah will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Wise.]

[22:19 These are two adversaries who have disputed over their Lord. But those who disbelieved will have cut out for them garments of fire. Poured upon their heads will be scalding water.]

[47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.]

[8:65 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.]

[8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired to the angels, "I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip."]


Remember, these verses was written at time of war. Based on my understanding, I can see the girl carefully manipulated the verses. I doubt even for a Muslim would have a deep profound understanding of them verses. Yet they follow what is good and as advised by the teachers. To understand what the verses really mean, in depth - one need to refer to an Islamic scholar or a Theologian. And I don’t think one scholar’s opinion will be the same with another, but still - check before shooting the mouth off. Give this to a retard like Boko Haram and he can do wonders with it, just like this girl. As a bonus, those Enlightened Beings" who trolled based on this Philippine Scholar’s findings, might want to check out this link:

8. The Deception

However, I have noticed that most of the Enlightened Beings whom condemn Islam on the remise of war and killing, have never flipped the Bible in their entire life. Because if they did, they will understand there are 3 times mores versus, scripts, psalms, of murder and killing. They claim that Jesus Christ never killed a person is an absolute and absurd lie. See also "Jesus Loves His Enemies.. and Then Kills Them All!"

In my almost 50 years of attendance of Friday "Solat", I have not heard of any "Khutbah" that asks Muslims to slit the throat of the non-Muslims or have I seen a Muslim beheading a non-Muslim after the Solat or Khutbah.

To all Muslims whom have been deceived by our Christian brethren’s, take notice that as much as they can cherry pick versus from the Quran about wars, so can we twice the number from their 1st Century Bible. It’s a deception of the self-proclaimed Enlightened Beings to lie to us that Jesus Christ (pbuh) never supports a war.  Below are their teaching of "peace" in the 1st Century Old Testament that you can quote.

Exodus 20:13, “You shall not kill,” and then seeking to apply this command to war. In the Hebrew word literally means “the intentional, premeditated killing of another person with malice; murder.” God often ordered the Israelites to go to war with other nations (1 Samuel 15:3; Joshua 4:13). God ordered the death penalty for numerous crimes (Exodus 21:12, 15; 22:19; Leviticus 20:11). So, God is not against killing, but only murder!? 

In a world filled with sinful people (Romans 3:10-18), war is inevitable. Sometimes the only way to keep sinful people from doing great harm to the innocent is by going to war. "He who sacrifices to any god, other than to the LORD alone, shall be utterly destroyed” (Exodus 22:20). Therefore, it supports the theory that the U.S./Israel brotherhood deploys false flags in Middle East to create "sinful people' so that they can wager war.

In the Old Testament, God ordered the Israelites to “take vengeance on the Midianites for the Israelites” (Numbers 31:2). Deuteronomy 20:16-17 declares, “However, in the cities of the nations the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them…as the LORD your God has commanded you.” Also, 1 Samuel 15:18 says, “Go and completely destroy those wicked people, the Amalekites; make war on them until you have wiped them out.” Jesus is always in perfect agreement with the Father (John 10:30), so we cannot argue that war was only God’s will in the Old Testament. God does not change (Malachi 3:6; James 1:17).

Jesus’ second coming will be exceedingly violent. Revelation 19:11-21 describes the ultimate war with Christ, the conquering commander who judges and makes war “with justice” (v. 11). It’s going to be bloody (v. 13) and gory. The birds will eat the flesh of all those who oppose Him (v. 17-18). He has no compassion upon His enemies, whom He will conquer completely and consign to a “fiery lake of burning sulfur” (v. 20).

But remember my fellow Muslims, do not attack unless attacked by these campaigners who wants to start WWIII. "Allah does not forbid you (acting justly) from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly. – QS 60:8

9. The Apparent

On another Facebook page, one Madhih Abdulla wrote. We are not your enemy. You are not our enemy. Islam does not say to kill the non Muslim. When Quran talks about killing non Muslim, the context is Muslims were at war with non Muslims, a war Muslims didn't start (Muslims are not allowed to start a war). The verse was revealed then. To kill them (not to run and hide). Even when killing them not to kill children, women, innocents, animals, trees, their worship places, etc. And if the enemy surrenders give them full security. That is what Quran says.

Do you think these days when enemy surrenders (in fear or not) the US gives them full security?

Torturing people to death, Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, secret prisons, lifetime in prisons without any trial, gang raping teens and burning them with their families?



The US and Israel govt wants you to hate Muslims. If you want to know Islam read Quran just once. You cannot judge a Ferrari by a bad driver.

Islam prohibits killing innocents and suicide, and also lying. There is nothing called "taqiyya" in Islam. You cannot learn Medicine from books of Accounts, likewise you cannot learn Islam from Media. You have to read Quran. Lying is a major sin in Islam. So is killing.
If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Quran 5:32]       
  • Religion is not mentioned.
  • Race is not mentioned
  • Age is not mentioned.
  • Country is not mentioned.
  • Gender is not mentioned.
  • Color is not mentioned.
Like you say Saddam/Osama represents Islam we can say Hitler/Bush represents Christianity. In the last 50 years US alone has killed at least 50 million people. Bush and Hitler nearly 8 million.
Some say all terrorists are Muslims.

Think about it.
  • Who killed nearly 2 million Iraqis and Afghans... Muslim
  • Who were behind 9/11 and London Bombing... Muslims?
  • Who owns the God damn media that deceives us... Muslims?
  • Who kills for oil... Muslims?
  • Who Invades foreign countries more... Muslims?
  • Who rapes women every 32 sec in US and 2/3 women in US Military... Muslims?
  • Who killed 12 people in Colorado cinema... Muslims?
  • Who killed 30,000 Muslims Burma... Muslims?
  • Who spies on other countries' peoples and governments... Muslims?
None of these people are called "terrorist".The people who give the label "terrorism" is at war with Muslims. That is why you see the people have the label "terrorist" are Muslims.

2.       7/7 London Bombings    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnkNoNIgnK8
3.       9/11       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igX7Z8VstN4
4.       Fallujah, Iraq - The Hidden Massacre      Warning: Highly Disturbing         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5qgfUjzbj4&oref
5.       Fahrenheit 911 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwLT_8S_Tuo
6.       Occupation 101 (Palestine-Israel)             http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_jvXnPG9Xc

When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "We are only peacemakers." [Quran 2:11]

Isn't this the case today... in the name of Freedom and Democracy!
Law of current world

Muslims = Guilty (until proven innocent)
Non Muslim = Innocent (until proven guilty)

Some say Muslims kill Americans. This is my message for them.

//You invaded my country, you shot my mother, beat my father to death, raped my sister, took my water, burned my trees, destroyed my home, hospitals, schools, stopped electricity, took my job, still stealing our oil, bomb my country daily, starve and humiliate us all. Yet you want me to greet you with flowers and candy?

When Muslims fight back you call them TERRORISTS? But they are Freedom Fighters. We don’t say they are completely right, we don’t say we agree with everything they do.

Your troops wouldn't die if they were with their families and let us be with our families happily.
The whole idea of Freedom Fighters is glorified, it is honorable to defend your country, except if you are a Muslim? The Muslim is not supposed to defend his country? The Muslim is just supposed to get out, walk away, live like a dog, be humiliated, allow his wife to be slaughtered, sister to be raped? A Muslim is supposed to accept this to be a good and an acceptable Muslim?

For Indians Mahatma Gandhi was a Freedom Fighter, but for occupiers he was a Terrorist. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. The difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is simply which news paper you are reading. Terrorist is a buzz word used to push an agenda, to push the masses' button, go get them to not think.//

Islam is not responsible for the behavior of few reckless Muslims.

The Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said: "They are the losers, those who make the religion hard and tough. They imperil themselves who enforce tough practices of Islam. They destroy themselves, those who are extremes."

The Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said: “Those who go to extremes are doomed.”
The more you know about Islam, the more you realize how much you don't know - the less you know, 
the more you think you know.

“Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery.” ― Malcolm X

Zionism behind all the major problems in this world. The enemy of my enemy (Muslims) is my friend (Christians). Every time Muslims get along with Christians they create a diversion. The more the Christians get closer to Muslims the more they get away from Zionists. So they don't want this to happen.

 “The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” - Malcolm X

“Whoever controls the media, controls the mind.” -  Jim Morrison

1500 newspapers, 1100 magazines, 9000 radio stations, 1500 TV stations, 2400 publishers all owned by 3 corporations. Six Zionist Companies own 96% of the World’s Media

If you're not careful, the Media will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.

There is nothing between truth and falsehood except what is false. When the truth shifts its ground, even by an inch, it loses its status as the truth.

Muslims and Media, check this link.

Muslims love Jesus, we defend Jesus and Mary. A Muslim would never say a word against Jesus. One single word against Jesus and he is no longer a Muslim. A Muslim cannot be a Muslim if he doesn't not believe in Jesus. We have seen some people insulting Islam/Mosques/Muslims/Mohamed/Allah, but we have never seen a Muslim insulting Jesus or Mary.

Israel has insulted Jesus and Mary on live TV. It is on YouTube to watch.

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the Bible."I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth is come, he will guide you unto all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me". [Gospel of John 16:12-14]

God revealed the Quran to Mohamed, he read it to his companions and they wrote it down. Quran does not have a single letter of Mohamed or any human being. [Jesus: "he shall not speak of himself but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak:"]

Mohamed is the only one who glorified Jesus who came after him. [Jesus said: He shall glorify me]

Quran has a chapter [19] by the name "Mary".

"Allah Akbar" does not mean "3, 2, 1, boom", it means "God is great". In Arabic "God" is "Allah". Check Arabic Bible, they use "Allah" instead of "God", ask an Arabic Christian to translate "God (as in Jesus or whoever God is) is great" to Arabic.

"Jihad's" English translation is to "strive and struggle", NOT "holy war"..."holy war" in Arabic is "Harb al Muqadasa"... That is nowhere found in Quran and Hadith. Holy war has nothing to do with Islam. Eg, If a student is working hard to pass the exam, he is doing jihad. US soldiers fighting Afghans to win the war, they are doing jihad. A parent forces his son to go to Church or to school, s/he is doing jihad. I'm trying to unite Muslims and non-Muslims, I'm doing jihad.

Beating wives, female genital mutilation, sharia law, honor killing etc, all these are just propaganda.

"Beware of false knowledge, it is more dangerous than ignorance" - George Bernard Shaw

"Whenever you get information, check it up before you pass it on to third person" [Quran 49.6]

"Ask the People of Knowledge if you do not know" [Quran 21:7]

The money required to eradicate hunger for everyone in the world has been estimated at $30 billion a year...... about as much as the world spends on the military every 8 days. The US provides Israel $8.5 million in military aid each day.

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres, October 3, 2001

They could use that money on education and health care.

Pentagon reports that almost three rapes occur every hour in the US military. FBI statistics: every 32 sec a rape takes place in US. Many victims fail to report sexual assault out of fear of vengeance or lack of justice under the US military’s system of prosecution.

72 women are raped every 24 hours in India, that's 1 woman every 20 mins.

Those women didn't deserve it. And Muslims do NOT blame any religion. There are blacksheeps in every community.

NO Wife Beating in Islam. Beating is just symbolic (tapping with a handkerchief, either on hand or leg and should not leave a mark)

Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said, “The best of you are those who are best to your women”.

Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said, "None but a noble man treats women in an honorable manner, and none but an ignorant treats women disgracefully".

Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said, "I urge you to treat women well".

It is strictly forbidden to hurt a woman."

Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said, "Be kind to the women, because verily they are in your truth".

Womens Rights in Islam                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pESXwJYYcGo

50 year old Muslims marries a 15 year old girl, Breaking News, every TV screen every hour on every news. (but with her will, with her parents will)

50 year old man (non Muslim) rapes a 15 year old girl, news brief for few minutes. (against her will)

Education:
The Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said: "Seeking knowledge is an obligation upon every Muslim".
1st creation: a pen. 1st message to the Prophet Mohamed (pbuh): "read".

In Islam, it is a must to get education and make the world a better place, whether you are a man or woman. I have seen Muslim women pilots, bus/car drivers, motorcycle riders, big bike riders, nurses, doctors, presidents, ministers, parliament members, general managers, construction workers etc etc. It is not a must to stay at home.

Pakistani Malala was a tool the Media used to attack Islam. They took the advantage.

Dear non Muslim, the Zionism is destroying the world, by spreading hate and corruption.

The Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) foretold us (1400 years ago) about the wars between same religion (WWII, between borders), wars between religions (whats happening now). Just like you didn't blame borders don't blame religions. Blame politicians and sick minded people.

The Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said "an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white".
·        
  • Speak the Truth                Quran 3:17
  • Speak Straight                  Quran 33:70
  •  Speak Justice                   Quran 6:152
  • Speak Kindly                    Quran 2:83
  •  Speak Politely                  Quran 17:53
  • Speak Fairly                     Quran 17:28
  • Speak Gently                    Quran 20:44
  • Speak Graciously             Quran 17:23
  • Speak not in Vain             Quran 23:3
  • Speak no Lie                     Quran 22:30
  • Speak not to Backbite      Quran 49:12
  • Speak not without Proof  Quran 2:111
  •  Speak no Slander             Quran 33:5

Show forgiveness, enjoin what is good, and turn away from the ignorant [Quran 7.199]

We are not your enemy. You are not our enemy. Ignorance leads to fear, fear leads to hatred, and hatred gives violence. That is the equation. In the age of information ignorance is a choice.

Thank you

A Muslim

10. Taqiyah

Taqiyah is an Arabic word, but the meaning of which is widely used in many armies/militaries since the Barbarians. Taqiyah via English translation simply means there is only one lie than can be forgiven, that is in the event you need to save your life or the lives of your others. But in Islam, it narrows to the need to deny ones religion when one is faced with persecution, especially by Sunnites whom regard it to means of protecting the religion.

Ancient maybe but it is apparent not only in militaries today but amongst the general population. Some lie/defame to amaze wealth and power but has no association with Taqiyah.

Unfortunately, there are some sick, tormented, retarded Enlightened Beings on Facebook mainly on Ojay Khoo’s page - who can’t even tell the difference between a “Hadith”, “Fatwa”, Quran and the Phonebook, will twist and turn to defame a Muslim. In Islam, defamation is worse than murder. The ancient punishment is beheading, although I would prefer a “non-Barbaric” method like hanging, lethal injection or electrocution - where liars can die very slowly J Why offer liars the pleasure of quick painless death – right?



11. Conclusion

In conclusion, self-proclaimed Enlightened Beings have overwhelmed the social network with all the trolling's, acting as the “moral Prosecutor” and expecting the liberal minded Muslims to be the “Defendant” of their religion of peace. As much as we want and attempt occasionally, we are sucked into the debate as believer of violence, hate and barbarism.

The world acknowledge, including Muslims that the atrocities against the innocents taking place in the Middle East and in any other part of the world is utterly wrong, irrespective if they were initiated by the U.S. or Israel, whether it is for territory, land, oil or power and to use religion as an excuse to drive their agenda. The scriptures and versus of killings in the 1st Century Christianity of the “Old Testament” and the 6th Century Quran “The Spoils of War”, “Their Repentance” is no longer applicable today. We are literally in peace time and the general population have come to live in respect of each other’s beliefs and we do not subscribe to any of the deceptions by ISIS, ISIL, IS, Syiah, Al-Qaeda, Mossad, Boko Haram, Illuminati, CIA, United States or Israel etc.

Leaders of third world have been a great example in using religion as a tool to cling on to power and to loot all there is. Deceptive institutions and Medias are setup, procure false “fatwas” to keep the gullible masses in toe, generating more control to themselves. The loss of lives seems negligible to them either shot point blank, electrocuted, hanged, gassed, burnt, bombed or beheaded does not seem to stop them from their ultimate goal.

In Malaysia, “the regime” uses religious institutions, NGO and Mosques to push their agenda, with selective quotes and verse to shift people’s perspectives, create racial or religious tension, or both. Divide and rule for eternity. They won’t let us die and they won’t let us live. Because they need us to sustain an equilibrium as a money producing machines. We fear all these bodies will one day turn into extremists or cults just like in the Middle East when we take the power off their hands.

Apart from that, I can only advise the many "Enlightened Beings" with names like James, David, John, Sunny, to go ahead, troll and spew as much vitriol as their religion (if any) teaches them. Be blinded of the stained hands of U.S. and Israel relentless attempts in destabilizing Middle East and Islam since ages. Sending agents (e.g. John McCain, Dick Cheney) into Middle East to search and resurface ancient, dead and gone cults, beliefs, brands and giving them a new lease of life. Funding, supplying them with artilleries (rather than education), training them, initiating Coupe D’état and False Flags to dismantle the Islamic countries.

However, despite all that, Islam in Europe and Asia is growing from 22%, at the rate of 1.23% a year, whilst Christianity in the west is dropping from 33% at the rate of 3.01% a year. Islam growth is not because of ISIS method of “convert or die” but through Europe and Asia by observation and education. Whereas the drop in Christianity in the west are the result of the increasing atheism, that breaks the barrier to free sex, same gender marriage and unlimited social freedom. Note that the U.S. has the highest report on rape (followed by India). Where a rape takes place every 30 seconds in the U.S. whilst in India a rape takes place every 25 minutes.


Any wars procured in the name of a religion or Genocide are just a convenient deception created by power greedy leaders to amaze wealth. I urge people to utilize all of their mental faculties, leave behind their ego and religious hypocrisy and instead focus the energy and attention to procure peace and the betterment of humanity.

- Ali Karim



DEBUNKED SPINNING'S

CAUTION: There is too much spinning by the media. The people don’t know the whole truth anymore of what is going on at ground zero.


DEBUNKED SPINNING #1 (Systematic Beheading)

One Bruce Fenton (an American wrote):

The article about Iraqi's "systematically beheading Christian children" has been published by over 10,000 news sources and shared over 2,500,000 times on social media.

The source? ONE guy in San Diego named Mark Arabo who said this in a CNN interview. He had no firsthand knowledge, no evidence and no eyewitnesses or journalists have been able to corroborate the story.

Arabo (standing next to Obama) is active in several vocal Christian groups and is an advocate of continued war in Iraq. In other words, a scumbag. There are about 20,000 Christian extremist and fanatics in the U.S. worship him more God and/or Jesus Christ (pbuh).

Why does one dubious source get shared so much? Because people want it to be true. They want it to be true so badly that they will criticize this post, criticize the fact checkers who have debunked this and claim that anyone questioning this is siding with the enemy. People will take unrelated stories and photos from entirely different countries and claim them to be relevant just to prove the point they wish to make which is exactly what the government has told them what to believe.

All this serves to distract us from the truth which is that we funded ISIS and provided them with many of the weapons they use. We did the same thing with the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan who ended up morphing into today's Taliban. Years before that we gave support to the Mujahidin when they fought the Soviets and they later became Al Qaida. We've done this many times.

It's odd that so many who distrust the government or current administration take what government says without question.

Does pointing out this bullshit mean I support ISIS? No, those guys generally seem to be world class assholes, but they are assholes who would not exist without our broken foreign policy. The proposed solution of bombing more people and repeating the mistakes we've made before doesn't seem to be a solution at all.

Stop wasting the lives of American troops and the money of American taxpayers on propaganda.

-              Bruce Fenton

Irrespective whether ISIS/ISIL/Al-Qaeda are evil, Barbaric or otherwise, here’s in a nutshell why the U.S. (and Israel) have history of sending agents (E.g. John McCain, Dick Cheney) to Middle East, shopping for ancient, dead and gone cults and giving them a new lease of life by funding them, supplying artilleries and training them. Compliments of Alex Jones. 

Whether or not he is a conspiracy theories, he has more knowledge on the issue than any of us keyboard warriors. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfzMHDkdIC4&feature=youtu.be



DEBUNKED SPINNING #2 (Marriage with underage girls)

There is a fake report being distributed claiming that an ISIS rebel declared his marriage to 7 year old girl. The report is fake as he is a Tunisian hosting a Quran recital completion amongst kids. The flag behind him is not the propriety of ISIS. Many Muslims in Middle East display the banner in statement of peace. Watch the event here. http://youtu.be/STidtelO6ZQ?list=UUWX9-xfmjPU_bJN80NwQhEQ


This Tunisian man, Abu Waqqas mission is to educate and help old folks, the poor and needy. As a result of a lie reported of him, recycled to thousands of people on the social network, his life may be at risk. May God have mercy on those who spew lies or opinion without having full knowledge of the issue?


DEBUNKED SPINNING #3 (BEHEADING)

CBS Journalist Richard Schlesinger wrote:

"A picture of a headless child was spreading like wildfire on the social network. The body of the same child (based on clothing’s) appeared on CNN report a year earlier to be a victim of sniper shot from Gaza. 

The 10 Syiah militants being beheaded and assassinated by ISIS was falsified and disseminated by Christian propaganda community claiming to be the acts of ISIS beheading Iraqi Christians.


DEBUNKED SPINNING #4 (TERRORISM)

Dr. Carol Rosin wrote:

A scientist, Wernher von Braun did warn of such a timeline. Many articles that mention him tend to pop up on ufology sites. In brief for those that have never heard the name, here is what Wikipedia have to say.

"Wernher Magnus Maximilian Freiherr[1] von Braun (March 23, 1912 – June 16, 1977) was one of the leading figures in the development of rocket technology in Nazi Germany and the United States. The German scientist, who led Nazi Germany's rocket development program (V-2) before and during World War II, entered the United States at the end of the war through the then-secret Operation Paperclip. He became a naturalized U.S. citizen and worked on the American ICBM program before joining NASA, where he served as director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and the chief architect of the Saturn V launch vehicle, the super booster that propelled the United States to the Moon [1]. He is generally regarded as the father of the United States space program." - Wikipedia


Just before he died, he gave an interview to Carol Rosin, in which he basically said that in order to sustain the military-industrial complex that first a false threat of terrorists would be created and used on the public and then asteroids and finally a false alien threat. Well we have all seen the terrorist threat and it's quickly becoming tiresome for many. So perhaps a different enemy is what is needed? Considering his stature he's making quite a prediction in this interview. You can hear Carol Rosin talk about it here. http://youtu.be/CaTgOSHbBEI — with Dr. Carol Rosin.




DEBUNKED SPINNING #5 (ISIS Beheading is barbaric)

A Pro American Syrian militant beheading civilians observed by U.S. Soldier, April 2014.













DEBUNKED SPINNING #6 (ISLAM SUPPORTS TERRORISM)


Islamic Statements Against Terrorism


1.       Shaykh Yusuf Qaradawi, Qatar; Tariq Bishri, Egypt; Muhammad S. Awwa, Egypt; Fahmi Huwaydi, Egypt; Haytham Khayyat, Syria; Shaykh Taha Jabir al-Alwani, U.S.:

“All Muslims ought to be united against all those who terrorize the innocents, and those who permit the killing of non-combatants without a justifiable reason. Islam has declared the spilling of blood and the destruction of property as absolute prohibitions until the Day of Judgment. … [It is] necessary to apprehend the true perpetrators of these crimes, as well as those who aid and abet them through incitement, financing or other support. They must be brought to justice in an impartial court of law and [punished] appropriately. … [It is] a duty of Muslims to participate in this effort with all possible means.”

Statement of September 27, 2001.

2.       Shaykh Muhammed Sayyid al-Tantawi, imam of al-Azhar mosque in Cairo, Egypt:

“Attacking innocent people is not courageous, it is stupid and will be punished on the day of judgement. … It’s not courageous to attack innocent children, women and civilians. It is courageous to protect freedom, it is courageous to defend oneself and not to attack.”

Agence France Presse, September 14, 2001

3.       Abdel-Mo’tei Bayyoumi, al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy, Cairo, Egypt:

“There is no terrorism or a threat to civilians in jihad [religious struggle].”

Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 20 – 26 September 2001 (via archive.org).

4.       Muslim Brotherhood, an opposition Islamist group in Egypt, said it was “horrified” by the attack and expressed “condolences and sadness”:

“[We] strongly condemn such activities that are against all humanist and Islamic morals. … [We] condemn and oppose all aggression on human life, freedom and dignity anywhere in the world.”
Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 13 – 19 September 2001 (via archive.org).

5.       Shaykh Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah, spiritual guide of the Hizbullah movement in Lebanon, said he was “horrified” by these “barbaric … crimes”:

“Beside the fact that they are forbidden by Islam, these acts do not serve those who carried them out but their victims, who will reap the sympathy of the whole world. … Islamists who live according to the human values of Islam could not commit such crimes.”

Agence France Presse, September 14, 2001

6.       ‘Abdulaziz bin ‘Abdallah Al-Ashaykh, chief mufti of Saudi Arabia:

“Firstly: the recent developments in the United States including hijacking planes, terrorizing innocent people and shedding blood, constitute a form of injustice that cannot be tolerated by Islam, which views them as gross crimes and sinful acts. Secondly: any Muslim who is aware of the teachings of his religion and who adheres to the directives of the Holy Qur’an and the sunnah (the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad) will never involve himself in such acts, because they will invoke the anger of God Almighty and lead to harm and corruption on earth.”

Statement of September 15, 2001 (via archive.org).

7.       ‘Abdulaziz bin ‘Abdallah Al-Ashaykh, chief mufti of Saudi Arabia:
“You must know Islam’s firm position against all these terrible crimes. The world must know that Islam is a religion of peace and mercy and goodness; it is a religion of justice and guidance…Islam has forbidden violence in all its forms. It forbids the hijacking airplanes, ships and other means of transport, and it forbids all acts that undermine the security of the innocent.”
Hajj sermon of February 2, 2004, in “Public Statements by Senior Saudi Officials Condemning Extremism and Promoting Moderation,” May 2004, page 10 (via archive.org).

8.       Shaikh Saleh Al-Luheidan, Chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council, Saudi Arabia:

“As a human community we must be vigilant and careful to oppose these pernicious and shameless evils, which are not justified by any sane logic, nor by the religion of Islam.”
Statement of September 14, 2001, in “Public Statements by Senior Saudi Officials Condemning Extremism and Promoting Moderation,” May 2004, page 6 (via archive.org).

9.       Shaikh Saleh Al-Luheidan, Chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council, Saudi Arabia:

“And I repeat once again: that this act that the United States was afflicted with, with this vulgarity and barbarism, and which is even more barbaric than terrorist acts, I say that these acts are from the depths of depravity and the worst of evils.”

Televised statement of September 2001, in Muhammad ibn Hussin Al-Qahtani, editor, The Position of Saudi Muslim Scholars Regarding Terrorism in the Name of Islam (Saudi Arabia, 2004), pages 27-28.

10.   Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdallah al-Sabil, member of the Council of Senior Religious Scholars, Saudi Arabia:

“Any attack on innocent people is unlawful and contrary to shari’a (Islamic law). … Muslims must safeguard the lives, honor and property of Christians and Jews. Attacking them contradicts shari’a.”
Agence France Presse, December 4, 2001

11.   Council of Saudi ‘Ulama, fatwa of February 2003:

“What is happening in some countries from the shedding of the innocent blood and the bombing of buildings and ships and the destruction of public and private installations is a criminal act against Islam. … Those who carry out such acts have the deviant beliefs and misleading ideologies and are responsible for the crime. Islam and Muslims should not be held responsible for such actions.”

The Dawn newspaper, Karachi, Pakistan, February 8, 2003 (via archive.org); also in “Public Statements by Senior Saudi Officials Condemning Extremism and Promoting Moderation,” May 2004, page 10 (via archive.org).

12.   Shaykh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, chairman of the Sunna and Sira Council, Qatar:

“Our hearts bleed for the attacks that has targeted the World Trade Center [WTC], as well as other institutions in the United States despite our strong oppositions to the American biased policy towards Israel on the military, political and economic fronts. Islam, the religion of tolerance, holds the human soul in high esteem, and considers the attack against innocent human beings a grave sin, this is backed by the Qur’anic verse which reads: ‘Who so ever kills a human being [as punishment] for [crimes] other than manslaughter or [sowing] corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he has killed all mankind, and who so ever saves the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind’ (Al-Ma’idah:32).”

Statement of September 13, 2001 (via archive.org).

13.   Tahirul Qadri, head of the Awami Tehrik Party, Pakistan:

“Bombing embassies or destroying non-military installations like the World Trade Center is no jihad. … “[T]hose who launched the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks not only killed thousands of innocent people in the United States but also put the lives of millions of Muslims across the world at risk. … Bin Laden is not a prophet that we should put thousands of lives at risk for.”

United Press International, October 18, 2001.

14.   Ayatollah Ali Khamene’i, supreme jurist-ruler of Iran:

“Killing of people, in any place and with any kind of weapons, including atomic bombs, long-range missiles, biological or chemical weopons, passenger or war planes, carried out by any organization, country or individuals is condemned. … It makes no difference whether such massacres happen in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Qana, Sabra, Shatila, Deir Yassin, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq or in New York and Washington.”

Islamic Republic News Agency, September 16, 2001 (via archive.org).

15.   President Muhammad Khatami of Iran:

“[T]he September 11 terrorist blasts in America can only be the job of a group that have voluntarily severed their own ears and tongues, so that the only language with which they could communicate would be destroying and spreading death.”

Address to the United Nations General Assembly, November 9, 2001 (via archive.org).

16.   League of Arab States:

“The General-Secretariat of the League of Arab States shares with the people and government of the United States of America the feelings of revulsion, horror and shock over the terrorist attacks that ripped through the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, inflicting heavy damage and killing and wounding thousands of many nationalities. These terrorist crimes have been viewed by the League as inadmissible and deserving all condemnation. Divergence of views between the Arabs and the United States over the latter’s foreign policy on the Middle East crisis does in no way adversely affect the common Arab attitude of compassion with the people and government of the United States at such moments of facing the menace and ruthlessness of international terrorism. In more than one statement released since the horrendous attacks, the League has also expressed deep sympathy with the families of the victims. In remarks to newsmen immediately following the tragic events, Arab League Secretary-General Amre Moussa described the feelings of the Arab world as demonstrably sympathetic with the American people, particularly with families and individuals who lost their loved ones. “It is indeed tormenting that any country or people or city anywhere in the world be the scene of such disastrous attacks,” he added. While convinced that it is both inconceivable and lamentable that such a large-scale, organised terrorist campaign take place anywhere, anytime, the League believes that the dreadful attacks against WTC and the Pentagon unveil, time and again, that the cancer of terrorism can be extensively damaging if left unchecked. It follows that there is a pressing and urgent need to combat world terrorism. In this context, an earlier call by [Egyptian] President Hosni Mubarak for convening an international conference to draw up universal accord on ways and means to eradicate this phenomenon and demonstrate international solidarity is worthy of active consideration. The Arabs have walked a large distance in the fight against cross-border terrorism by concluding in April 1998 the Arab Agreement on Combating Terrorism.”

September 17, 2001.

17.   Dr. Abdelouahed Belkeziz, Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference:

“Following the bloody attacks against major buildings and installations in the United States yesterday, Tuesday, September 11, 2001, Dr. Abdelouahed Belkeziz, secretary-general of the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), stated that he was shocked and deeply saddened when he heard of those attacks which led to the death and injury of a very large number of innocent American citizens. Dr. Belkeziz said he was denouncing and condemning those criminal and brutal acts that ran counter to all covenants, humanitarian values and divine religions foremost among which was Islam.”

Press Release, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, September 12, 2001.

18.   Organization of the Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers:

“The Conference strongly condemned the brutal terror acts that befell the United States, caused huge losses in human lives from various nationalities and wreaked tremendous destruction and damage in New York and Washington. It further reaffirmed that these terror acts ran counter to the teachings of the divine religions as well as ethical and human values, stressed the necessity of tracking down the perpetrators of these acts in the light of the results of investigations and bringing them to justice to inflict on them the penalty they deserve, and underscored its support of this effort. In this respect, the Conference expressed its condolences to and sympathy with the people and government of the United States and the families of the victims in these mournful and tragic circumstances.”

Final Communique of the Ninth Extraordinary Session of the Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers, October 10, 2001.

19.   Organization of the Islamic Conference, Summit Conference:

“We are determined to fight terrorism in all its forms. … Islam is the religion of moderation. It rejects extremism and isolation. There is a need to confront deviant ideology where it appears, including in school curricula. Islam is the religion of diversity and tolerance.”

Daily Star (Beirut, Lebanon), December 9, 2005.

20.   Mehmet Nuri Yilmaz, Head of the Directorate of Religious Affairs of Turkey:

“Any human being, regardless of his ethnic and religious origin, will never think of carrying out such a violent, evil attack. Whatever its purpose is, this action cannot be justified and tolerated.”

Mehmet Nuri Yilmaz, “A Message on Ragaib Night and Terrorism,” September 21, 2001 (via archive.org).

21.   Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar), Turkish author:

“The religion of Islam can by no means countenance terrorism. On the contrary, terror (i.e. murder of innocent people) in Islam is a great sin, and Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace and justice to the world.”

Harun Yahya, Islam Denounces Terrorism.

22.   Shaikh Muhammad Yusuf Islahi, Pakistani-American Muslim leader:

“The sudden barbaric attack on innocent citizens living in peace is extremely distressing and deplorable. Every gentle human heart goes out to the victims of this attack and as humans we are ashamed at the barbarism perpetrated by a few people. Islam, which is a religion of peace and tolerance, condemns this act and sees this is as a wounding scar on the face of humanity. I appeal to Muslims to strongly condemn this act, express unity with the victims’ relatives, donate blood, money and do whatever it takes to help the affected people.”

“Messages From Shaikh Muhammad Yusuf Islahi” (via archive.org).

23.   Abdal-Hakim Murad, British Muslim author:

“Targeting civilians is a negation of every possible school of Sunni Islam. Suicide bombing is so foreign to the Quranic ethos that the Prophet Samson is entirely absent from our scriptures.”
“The Hijackers Were Not Muslims After All: Recapturing Islam From the Terrorists” (via archive.org).

24.   Syed Mumtaz Ali, President of the Canadian Society of Muslims:

“We condemn in the strongest terms possible what are apparently vicious and cowardly acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. We join with all Canadians in calling for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators. No political cause could ever be assisted by such immoral acts.”
Canadian Society of Muslims, Media Release, September 12, 2001 (via archive.org).

25.   American Muslim organizations:

“We reiterate our unequivocal condemnation of the crime committed on September 11, 2001 and join our fellow Americans in mourning the loss of up to 6000 innocent civilians.”

Muslim American Society (MAS), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Muslim Alliance of North America (MANA), Muslim Student Association (MSA), Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), United Association for Studies and Research (UASR), Solidarity International, American Muslims for Global Peace and Justice (AMGPJ), American Muslim Alliance (AMA), United Muslim Americans Association (UMAA), Islamic Media Foundation (IMF), American Muslim Foundation (AMF), Coordinating Council of Muslim Organizations (CCMO), American Muslims for Jerusalem (AMJ), Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA), October 22, 2001 (via archive.org).

26.   57 leaders of North American Islamic organizations, 77 intellectuals, and dozens of concerned citizens:

“As American Muslims and scholars of Islam, we wish to restate our conviction that peace and justice constitute the basic principles of the Muslim faith. We wish again to state unequivocally that neither the al-Qaeda organization nor Usama bin Laden represents Islam or reflects Muslim beliefs and practice. Rather, groups like al-Qaeda have misused and abused Islam in order to fit their own radical and indeed anti-Islamic agenda. Usama bin Laden and al-Qaeda’s actions are criminal, misguided and counter to the true teachings of Islam.”

Statement Rejecting Terrorism, September 9, 2002 (via archive.org).

27.   American Muslim Political Coordination Council:

“American Muslims utterly condemn what are apparently vicious and cowardly acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. We join with all Americans in calling for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators. No political cause could ever be assisted by such immoral acts.”

Full-page ad in The Washington Post, September 16, 2001.

28.   Dr. Agha Saeed, National Chair of the American Muslim Alliance:

“These attacks are against both divine and human laws and we condemn them in the strongest terms. The Muslim Americans join the nation in calling for swift apprehension and stiff punishment of the perpetrators, and offer our sympathies to the victims and their families.”

September 11, 2001 (via archive.org).

29.   Hamza Yusuf, American Muslim leader:

“Religious zealots of any creed are defeated people who lash out in desperation, and they often do horrific things. And if these people [who committed murder on September 11] indeed are Arabs, Muslims, they’re obviously very sick people and I can’t even look at it in religious terms. It’s politics, tragic politics. There’s no Islamic justification for any of it. … You can’t kill innocent people. There’s no Islamic declaration of war against the United States. I think every Muslim country except Afghanistan has an embassy in this country. And in Islam, a country where you have embassies is not considered a belligerent country. In Islam, the only wars that are permitted are between armies and they should engage on battlefields and engage nobly. The Prophet Muhammad said, “Do not kill women or children or non-combatants and do not kill old people or religious people,” and he mentioned priests, nuns and rabbis. And he said, “Do not cut down fruit-bearing trees and do not poison the wells of your enemies.” The Hadith, the sayings of the Prophet, say that no one can punish with fire except the lord of fire. It’s prohibited to burn anyone in Islam as a punishment. No one can grant these attackers any legitimacy. It was evil.”

San Jose Mercury News, September 15, 2001 (via archive.org).

30.   Nuh Ha Mim Keller, American Muslim author:

“Muslims have nothing to be ashamed of, and nothing to hide, and should simply tell people what their scholars and religious leaders have always said: first, that the Wahhabi sect has nothing to do with orthodox Islam, for its lack of tolerance is a perversion of traditional values; and second, that killing civilians is wrong and immoral.”

“Making the World Safe for Terrorism,” September 30, 2001 (via archive.org).

31.   Yusuf Islam (formerly Cat Stevens), prominent British Muslim:

“I wish to express my heartfelt horror at the indiscriminate terrorist attacks committed against innocent people of the United States yesterday. While it is still not clear who carried out the attack, it must be stated that no right thinking follower of Islam could possibly condone such an action: the Qur’an equates the murder of one innocent person with the murder of the whole of humanity. We pray for the families of all those who lost their lives in this unthinkable act of violence as well as all those injured; I hope to reflect the feelings of all Muslims and people around the world whose sympathies go out to the victims at this sorrowful moment.”
[On singing an a cappella version of "Peace Train" for the Concert for New York City:] “After the tragedy, my heart was heavy with sadness and shock, and I was determined to help in some way. Organizers asked me to take part in a message for tolerance and sing ‘Peace Train.’ Of course, I agreed. … As a Muslim from the West, it is important to me to let people know that these acts of mass murder have nothing to do with Islam and the beliefs of Muslims.”

Press release of September 13, 2001 (via archive.org), and interview of October 22, 2001 (via archive.org).

32.   Muslims Against Terrorism, a U.S.-based organization:

“As Muslims, we condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Ours is a religion of peace. We are sick and tired of extremists dictating the public face of Islam.”
“About us” (via archive.org). This statement was replaced by a new statement in favor of peace by the group’s successor organization, Muslim Voices for Peace.

33.   Abdulaziz Sachedina, professor of religious studies, University of Virginia:

“New York was grieving. Sorrow covered the horizons. The pain of separation and of missing family members, neighbors, citizens, humans could be felt in every corner of the country. That day was my personal day of “jihad” (“struggle”) — jihad with my pride and my identity as a Muslim. This is the true meaning of jihad — “struggle with one’s own ego and false pride.” I don’t ever recall that I had prayed so earnestly to God to spare attribution of such madness that was unleashed upon New York and Washington to the Muslims. I felt the pain and, perhaps for the first time in my entire life, I felt embarrassed at the thought that it could very well be my fellow Muslims who had committed this horrendous act of terrorism. How could these terrorists invoke God’s mercifulness and compassion when they had, through their evil act, put to shame the entire history of this great religion and its culture of toleration?”

“Where Was God on September 11?” (via archive.org).

34.   Ali Khan, professor of law, Washburn University School of Law, Topeka, Kansas:

“To the most learned in the text of the Quran, these verses must be read in the context of many other verses that stipulate the Islamic law of war—a war that the Islamic leader must declare after due consultation with advisers. For the less learned, however, these verses may provide the motivation and even the plot for a merciless strike against a self-chosen enemy.”

“Attack on America: An Islamic Perspective,” September 17, 2001.

35.   Muqtedar Khan, then an assistant professor of political science, Adrian College, Michigan:

“What happened on September 11th in New York and Washington DC will forever remain a horrible scar on the history of Islam and humanity. No matter how much we condemn it, and point to the Quran and the Sunnah to argue that Islam forbids the killing of innocent people, the fact remains that the perpetrators of this crime against humanity have indicated that their actions are sanctioned by Islamic values. The fact that even now several Muslim scholars and thousands of Muslims defend the accused is indicative that not all Muslims believe that the attacks are unIslamic. This is truly sad. … If anywhere in your hearts there is any sympathy or understanding with those who committed this act, I invite you to ask yourself this question, would Muhammad (pbuh) sanction such an act? While encouraging Muslims to struggle against injustice (Al Quran 4:135), Allah also imposes strict rules of engagement. He says in unequivocal terms that to kill an innocent being is like killing entire humanity (Al Quran 5:32). He also encourages Muslims to forgive Jews and Christians if they have committed injustices against us (Al Quran 2:109, 3:159, 5:85).”

“A Memo to American Muslims,” October 5, 2001.

36.   Dr. Alaa Al-Yousuf, Bahraini economist and political activist:

“On Friday, 14 September [the first Friday prayers after 11 September], almost the whole world expressed its condemnation of the crime and its grief for the bereaved families of the victims. Those who abstained or, even worse, rejoiced, will have joined the terrorists, not in the murder, but in adding to the incalculable damage on the other victims of the atrocity, namely, Islam as a faith, Muslims and Arabs as peoples, and possibly the Palestinian cause. The terrorists and their apologists managed to sully Islam as a faith both in the eyes of many Muslims and non-Muslims alike.”

Interview with the International Forum for Islamic Dialogue, London (via archive.org).

37.   Dr. S. Parvez Manzoor, Swedish-based Muslim author:

“If these acts of terror indeed have been perpetrated by Muslim radicals or fundamentalists, they have reaped nothing but eternal damnation, shame and ignominy. For nothing, absolutely nothing, could remotely be advanced as an excuse for these barbaric acts. They represent a total negation of Islamic values, an utter disregard of our fiqhi tradition, and a slap in the face of the Ummah. They are in total contrast to what Islamic reason, compassion and faith stand for. Even from the more mundane criteria of common good, the maslaha of the jurists, these acts are treasonous and suicidal. Islamic faith has been so callously and casually sacrificed at the altar of politics, a home-grown politics of parochial causes, primeval passions, self-endorsing piety and messianic terror.”

Interview with the International Forum for Islamic Dialogue, London (via archive.org).

38.   Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysian Islamic activist and former deputy prime minister:

“Never in Islam’s entire history has the action of so few of its followers caused the religion and its community of believers to be such an abomination in the eyes of others. Millions of Muslims who fled to North America and Europe to escape poverty and persecution at home have become the object of hatred and are now profiled as potential terrorists. And the nascent democratic movements in Muslim countries will regress for a few decades as ruling autocrats use their participation in the global war against terrorism to terrorize their critics and dissenters. This is what Mohammed Atta and his fellow terrorists and sponsors have done to Islam and its community worldwide by their murder of innocents at the World Trade Center in New York and the Defense Depart-ment in Washington. The attack must be condemned, and the condemnation must be without reservation.”

Anwar Ibrahim, “Growth of Democracy Is the Answer to Terrorism,” International Herald Tribune, October 11, 2001 (via archive.org).

39.   Ziauddin Sardar, British Muslim author:

“The failure of Islamic movements is their inability to come to terms with modernity, to give modernity a sustainable home-grown expression. Instead of engaging with the abundant problems that bedevil Muslim lives, the Islamic prescription consists of blind following of narrow pieties and slavish submission to inept obscurantists. Instead of engagement with the wider world, they have made Islam into an ethic of separation, separate under-development, and negation of the rest of the world.”

Ziauddin Sardar, “Islam has become its own enemy,” The Observer, October 21, 2001.

40.   Khaled Abou El Fadl, Kuwaiti-Egyptian-American legal scholar:

“It would be disingenuous to deny that the Qur’an and other Islamic sources offer possibilities of intolerant interpretation. Clearly these possibilities are exploited by the contemporary puritans and supremacists. But the text does not command such intolerant readings. Historically, Islamic civilization has displayed a remarkable ability to recognize possibilities of tolerance, and to act upon these possibilities.”
Khaled Abou El Fadl, “The Place of Tolerance in Islam: On Reading the Qur’an — and Misreading It,” 

Boston Review, December 2001/January 2002 (via archive.org).

41.   Sheikh Muhammad Ali Al-Hanooti, Palestinian-American mufti and member of the North American Fiqh Council:

“The people who attacked the WTC and Pentagon and hijacked the forth plane that crashed in Pennsylvania are criminal who deserve the severest punishment as the Quran elaborates. They are murderers and terrorists. If there were any person who felt happy for that incident we would not be able to equate them with those criminals, but we can say no one with faith and ethics would accept anything of that murder and targeting of innocent people.”

Sheikh Muhammad Ali Al-Hanooti, “Fatwa Session on Latest Tragic Events,” IslamOnline, September 20, 2001 (via archive.org).

42.   Syed Shahabuddin, Indian Muslim author:

“Islam prohibits terrorism as well as suicide. Jihad is neither and has no place for taking innocent lives or one’s own life. No cause, howsoever noble or just, can justify terrorism. So while one may sympathize with the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people and support their claim to a state of their own, while one may appreciate the democratic awakening among the people of many Muslim states and uphold their demand for withdrawal of foreign presence from their soil and support their struggle for revision of the terms of trade for their natural resources, no thinking Muslim can go along with the use of terrorism for securing political goals.”

Syed Shahabuddin, “Global war against terrorism – the Islamic dimension,” Milli Gazette newspaper (New Delhi, India), November 1, 2001.

43.   Dr. M. A. Zaki Badawi, principal of the Muslim College, London, England:

“Neither the law of Islam nor its ethical system justify such a crime.”

Dr. M. A. Zaki Badawi, “Terrorism has no place in Islam,” Arab News (Jiddah-Riyadh-Dhahran, Saudi Arabia), September 28, 2001.

44.   Mufti Nizamuddin Shamzai, head mufti at Jamiat-ul-Uloom-ul-Islamia seminary, Binori Town, Pakistan and a leader of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) party, Pakistan:

“It’s wrong to kill innocent people. … It’s also wrong to praise those who kill innocent people.”

The New York Times, September 28, 2001, p. B3.

45.   Shaykh Omar Bakri, leader of al-Muhajirun, a radical Islamist movement then based in London, England:

“If Islamists did it — and most likely it is Islamists, because of the nature of what happened — then they have fully misunderstood the teachings of Islam. … Even the most radical of us have condemned this. I am always considered to be a radical in the Islamic world and even I condemn it.”

The Gazette (Montreal, Quebec, Canada), September 13, 2001, p. B6.

46.   Zuhair Qudah, a preacher at al-Lawzieen mosque, Amman, Jordan:

“We stand by our Palestinian brothers in their struggle to end the occupation, but we don’t condone violence, ugly crimes and the killing of innocent people.”

Associated Press, September 14, 2001.

47.   Salih bin Muhammad Lahidan, chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council, Saudi Arabia:

“Killing the weak, infants, women, and the elderly, and destroying property, are considered serious crimes in Islam. . . . Viewing on the TV networks what happened to the twin towers . . . was like watching doomsday. Those who commit such crimes are the worst of people. Anyone who thinks that any Islamic scholar will condone such acts is totally wrong. . . . This barbaric act is not justified by any sane mind-set. . . . This act is pernicious and shameless and evil in the extreme.”

The Washington Post, October 13, 2001, p. B9.

48.   Shaykh Rached Ghannouchi, chairman of Tunisia’s an-Nahda Movement, in exile in London, England:

“Such destruction can only be condemned by any Muslim, however resentful one may be of America’s biased policies supporting occupation in Palestine, as an unacceptable attack on thousands of innocent people having no relation to American policies. Anyone familiar with Islam has no doubt about its rejection of collective punishment, based on the well-known Quranic principle that ‘no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another.’”

The Washington Post, October 13, 2001, p. B9

49.   Shaykh Salih al-Suhaymi, religious scholar, Saudi Arabia:

“Based upon what has preceded, then we say that that which we believe and hold as our religion concerning what happened to the World Trade Centre in America – and in Allaah lies success – that the terrorist attacks that took place and what occurred of general (mass) killing, then it is not permissible and Islaam does not allow it in any form whatsoever.”

“Shaykh Saalih as-Suhaymee speaks about current affairs…,” October 18, 2001, translated by Abu ‘Iyaad.

50.   Dr. Sayed G. Safavi, Iranian religious scholar and director of the Institute of Islamic Studies, London, England:

“The targeting of innocent persons cannot be allowed. Islam is against any form of terrorism, whether it be carried out by an individual, a group or a state. … For Muslims to kill civilians unconnected with any attack on them is a crime. The principal law of Islam is: don’t attack civilians. This includes civilians of any faith, whether Jewish, Muslim or Christian. According to Islam, all people are the family of God. The target of religion is peace.”

“United against terrorism,” The Daily Telegraph, London, England, June 30, 2003.

51.   Iqbal Siddiqui, editor of Crescent International, London, England:

“History also teaches us that the only effective way of challenging oppression and the only effective way of fighting injustice is through force; that is simply the way of the world. Pacifism is all too often a weapon of the status quo…. When Islamic movements in the world do need to resort to the use of force, that force must be used morally. When extreme fringes of those movements are pushed to use force indiscriminately, immorally, wrongly against illegitimate targets, and using illegitimate weapons (such [as] hijacked jumbo jets), those are crimes for which the people who share their cause, who share their view of the world, their understanding of the need to use force, must also criticise them, turn against them, isolate them. Our standards must be higher than those of the people whom we are fighting, because if we descend to their standards then there is no difference between us.”

Iqbal Siddiqui, “Terrorism and political violence in contemporary history,” Conference on Terrorism, Institute of Islamic Studies, London, England, November 13, 2001, published in Muslimedia International, February 16-28, 2002 (via archive.org). Earlier version also on-line via archive.org.

52.   Islamway website:

“The message of the Quran is clear as we have seen, that the sanctity of any human life is to be respected and any violation in that regard is paramount to the worst crime. Mercy is at the heart of the Islamic call, “We sent thee (O Muhammad) not save as a mercy for the peoples” (21:107); a totally different message to what the terrorists are sadly imparting to humanity.”

“What Does Islam Say About Terrorism?“

53.   Islamic Commission of Spain:

“Muslims, therefore, are not only forbidden from committing crimes against innocent people, but are responsible before God to stop those people who have the intention to do so, since these people ‘are planting the seeds of corruption on Earth’…. The perpetration of terrorist acts supposes a rupture of such magnitude with Islamic teaching that it allows to affirm that the individuals or groups who have perpetrated them have stopped being Muslim and have put themselves outside the sphere of Islam.”

“Text of the Fatwa Declared Against Osama Bin Laden by the Islamic Commission of Spain,” March 17, 2005; original Spanish version: “La Comisión Islámica de España emite una fatua condenando el terrorismo y al grupo Al Qaida,” March 10, 2005.

54.   The Amman Message, proclaimed by 200 Islamic scholars from 50 countries at a conference in Amman, Jordan, and later endorsed by hundreds of other Islamic scholars and the Organization of the Islamic Conference:

“Islam recognizes the noble station of [human] life, so there is to be no fighting against non-combatants, and no assault upon civilians and their properties, children at their mothers’ bosom, students in their schools, nor upon elderly men and women. Assault upon the life of a human being, be it murder, injury or threat, is an assault upon the right to life among all human beings. It is among the gravest of sins; for human life is the basis for the prosperity of humanity: Whoever kills a soul for other than slaying a soul or corruption upon the earth it is as if he has killed the whole of humanity, and whoever saves a life, it is as if has revived the whole of humanity. (5:32)”

The Official Website of the Amman Message, July 2005

55.   Fatwa signed by more than 500 British Muslim scholars, clerics, and imams:

“Islam strictly, strongly and severely condemns the use of violence and the destruction of innocent lives. There is neither place nor justification in Islam for extremism, fanaticism or terrorism. Suicide bombings, which killed and injured innocent people in London, are HARAAM – vehemently prohibited in Islam, and those who committed these barbaric acts in London [on July 7, 2005] are criminals not martyrs. Such acts, as perpetrated in London, are crimes against all of humanity and contrary to the teachings of Islam. … The Holy Quran declares: ‘Whoever kills a human being… then it is as though he has killed all mankind; and whoever saves a human life, it is as though he had saved all mankind.’ (Quran, Surah al-Maidah (5), verse 32) Islam’s position is clear and unequivocal: Murder of one soul is the murder of the whole of humanity; he who shows no respect for human life is an enemy of humanity.”

British Muslim Forum, press release of July 18, 2005 (via archive.org).

56.   Fiqh Council of North America, an association of 18 Muslim legal scholars, fatwa endorsed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS), the Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers (AMSE), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), and more than 130 Muslim organizations, mosques and leaders in the United States:

“We have consistently condemned terrorism and extremism in all forms and under all circumstances, and we reiterate this unequivocal position. Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of violence against innocent lives. There is no justification in Islam for extremism or terrorism. Targeting civilians’ life and property through suicide bombings or any other method of attack is haram – prohibited in Islam – and those who commit these barbaric acts are criminals, not ‘martyrs.’”

“Fatwa by U.S. Muslims Against Religious Extremism,” July 25, 2005 (via archive.org).

57.   Islamic Society of North America, Anti-Terrrorism Anti-Extremism Committee:

“Humanity lives today in an interdependent and interconnected world where peaceful and fair interaction, including interfaith and intra-faith dialogue, is imperative. A grave threat to all of us nowadays is the scourge of religious and political extremism that manifests itself in various forms of violence, including terrorism. In the absence of a universally agreed upon definition of terrorism, it may be defined as any act of indiscriminate violence that targets innocent people, whether committed by individuals, groups or states. As Muslims, we must face up to our responsibility to clarify and advocate a faith-based, righteous and moral position with regard to this problem, especially when terrorist acts are perpetrated in the name of Islam. The purpose of this brochure is to clarify a few key issues relating to this topic, not because of external pressures or for the sake of “political correctness”, but out of our sincere conviction of what Islam stands for.”
Islamic Society of North America, “Against Terrorism and Religious Extremism: Muslim Position and 

Responsibilities,” 2005 (via archive.org).

58.   Shaykh Abdulaziz Al-Asheikh, chief mufti of Saudi Arabia:

The London attacks, “targeting peaceful people, are not condoned by Islam, and are indeed prohibited by our religion. … Attributing to Islam acts of individual or collective killings, bombings, destruction of properties and the terrorizing of peaceful people is unfair, because they are alien to the divine religion.”

Fatwa-Online, July 9, 2005.

59.   Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab al-’Aqeel, professor of creed (‘aqeedah) at the College of Proselytising (da’wah), Islamic University of Madinah, Saudi Arabia:

“Terrorism is the terror that is caused by those groups or individuals who resort to killing and wreaking havoc and destruction. Terrorism is therefore, according to the contemporary compilers of modern Arabic dictionaries, killing akin to the riotous killing that is mentioned within the texts of Shar’eeah. As the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) mentioned with regards to the signs of the end of time, the spread of ‘al-Harj’ (riotous killing). The meaning of ‘al-Harj’ is killing and the increase of the spilling blood, which is all from the signs of the end of time. To the extent that the one killing will not know why he is killing and the one that was killed will not know why he/she was killed. Islam is free from this riotous killing, free from this terrorism and free from this kind of corruption. Terrorism is established upon destruction of properties such as factories, farms, places of worship, train stations, airports and the likes; Islam is clearly free from such actions that are based upon corruption and not upon rectification. Terrorists usually say that they are going against the state in which they are based within. This is like the mafia or other criminal organisations that are based on killing people, causing fear and taking their monies. Such criminal organisations have leaders, deputies and individuals that are responsible for establishing regulations for the organisation and individuals responsible for carrying out attacks, and all of them are terrorists causing corruption on the earth. However the ugliest face of terrorism is that which is established in the name of religion, all of the religions from the Prophets (peace be upon them) are free from such terrorism, even if some of the followers of the Prophets participated in such terrorist activities, but the Prophets are free from such corruptions.”

Lecture on “The Evils of Terrorism,” August 20, 2005, translated in Islam Against Terrorism – v1.20, September 17, 2005.

60.   Shaykh Muhammad Afifi al-Akiti, Malaysian Muslim scholar and research fellow in Islamic philosophy and theology, Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, U.K.:

“If you still insist that your [religious or civil] authority should declare war with the non-Muslim state upon which you wish war to be declared, then the most you could do in this capacity is to lobby your authority for it. However, if your anger is so unrestrained that its fire brings out the worst in you to the point that your disagreement with your Muslim authority leads you to declare war on those you want your authority to declare war on, and you end up resorting to violence, then know with certainty that you have violated our own religious Laws. For then you will have taken the Shari’a into your own hands.”

Shaykh Muhammad Afifi al-Akiti, Defending the Transgressed by Censuring the Reckless against the Killing of Civilians, Germany: Warda Publications, and United Kingdom: Aqsa Press, 2005, p.49.

61.   Abd al-Hakim Murad, British Muslim scholar:

“This is a decadence that is profound. And that it happens in the holy land is particularly worrying. Near the muqadsāt, where we are particularly required to conform entirely to the adāb of the Shari’ah. This is a deep subversion. And as for those who think that for reasons of masfahah that the door can be opened there, but somehow that door will remain closed elsewhere in the world, that this door can be opened because the Palestinians are so oppressed and somehow it’s going to help them, but of course we keep it closed in Chechnya and Kahsmir and certainly in London, that logic doesn’t seem to have worked too well. That rage, that desire to self annihilation, to lash out and the men, women and children, whoever in the vicinity, is now becoming a global epidemic. And the ‘ulama who opened the little door now see these legions rushing through it in every place don’t know what to do about it. That door has to be closed. Islam is too good for such practices, for such baseness, for such wild expression of futility and despair and vindictiveness.”

Interview, December 16-18, 2005, London-Leeds-Manchester (via archive.org).

62.   Islamic Society of North America:

“The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) condemns in the strongest terms the recent acts of terrorism in Glasgow, London and Yemen. We reaffirm our long-standing, unqualified condemnation of all acts of terrorism and all acts of violence committed against the innocent, and our denunciation of religious extremism and particularly the use of Islam to justify terrorism in any of its forms. We sympathize with the victims of these senseless attacks and offer our heart-felt condolences to the families who have lost their dear ones.”

“Islamic Society of North America Statement in Response to Recent Bombings,” July 10, 2007 (via archive.org).

63.   Maulana Marghubur Rahman, organizer of “Anti-Terrorism Convention” and rector of the Dar ul-Ulum Deoband madrasa, India:

“We condemn all forms of terrorism … and in this we make no distinction. Terrorism is completely wrong, no matter who engages in it, and no matter what religion he follows or community he belongs to.”

February 2008, translated by Yoginder Sikand.

64.   Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, founding leader of Minhaj-ul-Quran International, Pakistan:

“[T]he killing of Muslims and the perpetration of terrorism are not only unlawful and forbidden in Islam but also represent the rejection of faith.”

Fatwa on Suicide Bombings and Terrorism, March 2, 2010.

65.   New Mardin Declaration, Turkey:

“Ibn Taymiyya’s fatwa concerning Mardin can under no circumstances be appropriated and used as evidence for leveling the charge of kufr (unbelief) against fellow Muslims, rebelling against rulers, deeming game their lives and property, terrorizing those who enjoy safety and security, acting treacherously towards those who live (in harmony) with fellow Muslims or with whom fellow Muslims live (in harmony) via the bond of citizenship and peace.”

The New Mardin Declaration, March 28, 2010 (Arabic version).


More statements are released by Muslim organizations and religious scholars on a regular basis, but multiplying the examples may not persuade those who dismiss these dozens of examples.


 OTHER COLLECTIONS OF ISLAMIC STATEMENTS AGAINST TERRORISM

1.       Sheila Musaji, “Muslims Denounce Terrorism: Muslim Voices Against Extremism and Terrorism.”

2.       Omid Safi, “Scholars of Islam & the Tragedy of Sept. 11th.

3.       Tim Lubin, Washington and Lee University, “Islamic Responses to the Sept. 11 Attack.”

4.       The Becket Fund, “Osama Bin Laden Hijacked Four Airplanes and a Religion,” October 17, 2001 (via archive.org).

5.       Islam for Today, “Muslims Against Terrorism.”

6.       ReligiousTolerance.org, “Aftermath of the 9-11 Terrorist Attack: Voices of Moderate Muslims.”

7.       Al-Muhajabah’s Islamic Pages, “Muslims Condemn Terrorist Attacks.”

8.       Juan Cole, “Friedman Wrong About Muslims Again,” July 9, 2005.

9.       Fatwa-Online, “Worship \ Jihaad \ WTC – New York, USA – 9/11.”

10.   Fatwa-Online, “Worship \ Jihaad \ Terrorism an

18 comments:

  1. You are spot on with these enligtened beings, mostly Indians who study abroad think they have becoem supreme beinsg to lick mat salleh arse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ini hindu memang macam tu. Sakit hati punya bangsa. Diorang cita lebih lebih bodek Amerika. Baru tau speaking sikit ingat dah jadi mat salleh, sampai lupa kelembuan indu. Memang sah kata Bung Mokhtar ini semua jenis pariah.

      Delete
  2. Interesting “RUSSIA PRESENTS EVIDENCE AGAINST US, UK AND ISRAEL CO-CONSPIRATORS & 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!”
    AllahuAkhbar.

    http://activistshub.com/911-russia-leaks-prrof-9-11-inside-job/

    ReplyDelete
  3. All of these tongue lashings are only on social site. I reality, people just go about their bussines. As a nn-Muslim Malaysian, I dont have a problem walking around mosques or Muslims. Yes there are crimes all over the world, the media projects what they want us to see. We the viewer make up our minds. Take it easy my friend.

    ReplyDelete
  4. [9:28 O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Haram after this, their [final] year. And if you fear privation, Allah will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Wise.]

    What does this mean?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. During one of the battle, againts believers of multiple deities usually assembled into a pantheon of gods and goddesses, along with their own religions and rituals whom. Some say its the people whom were not circumcised and not allowed in the main Mosque, Makkah/Mecca. For a male whom is not circumcised.

      Delete
  5. All this American Israel campaign to divert attention from Palestine / Israel. Every time there is a problem in Israel, the westerns will launch anti-Islamic news, foto and video into the media to get the support of non-Muslims idiots. Most of the foto images video of Islamic criminal are old stock, recycle into social network.

    ReplyDelete
  6. One of the most common claim made by Christians is that Jesus never killed anybody. They often always bring this up against Muslims as if to show that the prophet Muhammad was a bad person because he killed people. Before refuting the myth that Jesus never killed anyone, we must also expose the Christian double standard and the Christian weak line of argument. If Jesus is great, and the prophet Muhammad is bad because he killed people, then so is Moses, and so is David.

    http://www.answering-christianity.com/sami_zaatri/another_bible_myth.htm

    ReplyDelete
  7. History of mankind is full of genocide rituals, from all over the world of every beliefs. Every century or so peaks a certain beliefs that can be seen as a process of evolution in the ultimate fate of mankind. We are at the time and age opportune to witness another game plan.

    Because the right and wrong seems to be determined by the world Police, moral judge, God, the United States. Their audiences behave like they have never seen genocide in their entire life. Rich with modern and devastating weapons and the control of the media, the latter agenda seems apparent. The ultimate genocide planned from the 1st Century biblical, to annihilate all other races and religions from the face of the earth in the name of peace. At the same time, ensure the survivability of the host planet earth to its equilibrium of only 60 million people.

    Every time there is killing/murder committed by a person with a Muslim name, Christians kick up so much dust about Islamic this and that - and sensationalize them. They put aside their daily routines and dedicate their time to lecture how bad is Islam, instead of how good Christianity. A self-activation of the subliminally embedded 1st Century program from Exodus, Joshua, Leviticus, Romans, Malachi, James, Deuteronomy, Samuel, etc. coming into play. The second coming of Jesus (pbuh) with (Revelation 19:11-21) for the ultimate war in the name of peace, when God has no compassion upon his enemies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean all this is "New World Order" game plan?

      Delete
    2. 1. Who started the First World War? A Muslim of Bosnian origin.
      2. Who started the Second World War? A German war leader with admiration and affinity to "prophet" Mohammed whom he wanted to emulate. The Nazi's got offered hundreds of thousands of Muslim volunteers to the Nazi army to commit genocide against the Jews, emulating the Muslim Armenian genocide of Christians.
      3. Who is trying to start a Third World War? Muslim terrorists spreading all across the Middle East, Asia, Europe.
      4. Who has killed 20 million Australian members? No one has killed "20 million" Australians!
      5. Who throw a nuclear bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima?
      6. Who has killed more than 100 million Indians in North America? No one has killed "100 million" people in North America! There was not even 100 million Indians in the entire world. Indian tribes warred against each other and died from diseases spread by Muslims all over the world in their prolific 140 million African slave trade.
      7. Who has killed more than 50 million Indians in South America? No one has killed "50 million" Indians in South America. Again, another Muslim fabricated number. South Americans have warred against their own.
      8. Who was caught with 180 million Africans, of which 88% died and were thrown into the Atlantic Ocean? Muslims caused the death of over 140 million Africans whom they enslaved, invaded and occupied with forced conversions.
      9. Who killed 1 million people to avenge the lives of 3000 in 9/11 WTC acted out by 4 crazy Arabs with box cutters? Muslim initiated terrorism which has been endless for the past 1400 years is the reactive cause for the death of Iraqi's, whoms government was engaged in the planning of 9/11. And the Arabs committing the act were 18 in number, not 4.

      These are FACTS compared to the endless Muslim lies and propaganda. Muslims are th4 most hateful people on earth.

      Delete
    3. These are RUBBISH compared to the endless lies and propaganda. I rather believe credible historians, professors, theologian or scholars like Pierre Vogel and not an Anonymous figment of his/her imagination.

      A scientist, Wernher von Braun did warn of such spinnings. Many articles that mention him tend to pop up on ufology sites. In brief for those that have never heard the name, here is what wikipedia have to say.

      "Wernher Magnus Maximilian Freiherr[1] von Braun (March 23, 1912 – June 16, 1977) was one of the leading figures in the development of rocket technology in Nazi Germany and the United States. The German scientist, who led Nazi Germany's rocket development program (V-2) before and during World War II, entered the United States at the end of the war through the then-secret Operation Paperclip. He became a naturalized U.S. citizen and worked on the American ICBM program before joining NASA, where he served as director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and the chief architect of the Saturn V launch vehicle, the superbooster that propelled the United States to the Moon[1]. He is generally regarded as the father of the United States space program." - Wikipedia

      Just before he died, he gave an interview to Carol Rosin, in which he basically said that in order to sustain the military-industrial complex that first a false threat of terrorists would be created and used on the public and then asteroids and finally a false alien threat. Well we have all seen the terrorist threat and it's quickly becoming tiresome for many. So perhaps a different enemy is what is needed? Considering his stature he's making quite a prediction in this interview. You can hear Carol Rosin talk about it here.

      http://youtu.be/CaTgOSHbBEI

      Delete
    4. Anonymous, Im sure you are a Malaysian Hindu. The black thing that sits on black stone on a black moonles night. This is for your info about the 18 Arabs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7Bws

      Delete
  8. "I'm not ignoring "ISIS" crimes, in fact I've been mentioning "ISIS" crimes for the last 3 years none stop on my facebook . "ISIS" are those that has been in Syria for years now killing christians and muslims , just their name has changed and everyone was not mobilized to expose them as it would mean exposing USA who is known for funding them . What's being done in Iraq today is and has been done in Syria for the last 4 years ... People killed, raped, beheaded their cities taken over , I do find it worrying today how everyone has been mobilized to promote "ISIS" crimes in Iraq, the worrying part is finding everyone doing it including those people who did not condemn the thugs doing the same exact same in Syria too,even mainstream media are exposing and condemning "ISIS" yet they did not condemn and expose these very crimes in Syria. It leads me to believe that unknowingly the masses are being mobilized to suit world order agenda and that is to make "ISIS" sound different from those thugs in Syria that US has been exposed of creating and funding , it makes US relation to the thugs in Syria seem like angels , it gives the impression that US is not affiliated to "ISIS" it saves US and takes the focus off Israel ... In other words it suits US interest to have an "ISIS" exposed now in Iraq with an Arab/muslim identity only . "ISIS" is Columbus ...it's changed it's name so often to manipulate the masses .. "ISIS" is America, is Israel , is United Nations , is Al Queda , was "osama bin laden" is the 'rebels' in Syria .. Is those in Iraq today . I've condemned the killing by "ISIS" all over always ... For the last 4 years they've been killing muslims and christians in Syria , I condemn the murder and destruction by US and it's allies all over , I condemn the murder of any human no matter what his religion or belief that's a given. I feel by me having to state that as a muslim I condemn the murder of Iraqi christians by "ISIS" is like me saying as a muslim I take responsibility that christians are being killed because of my religion ... I'm not prepared to take that responsibility ... USA and it's allies must be held responsible for that and exposed for that . I condemn USA tactics of creating 'terrorists' after 'terrorists' to manipulate and gain power ." from Sed Kim

    ReplyDelete
  9. Too many lies are being publish by Christians

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Especially Indians. With names like James Nararatnam, Joseph Vaitalinggam, David Vellu, Chris Christopherson Muniandy, etc.

      Delete
    2. Ini hindu memang macam tu. Sakit hati punya bangsa. Diorang cita lebih lebih bodek Amerika. Baru tau speaking sikit ingat dah jadi mat salleh, sampai lupa kelembuan indu. Memang sah kata Bung Mokhtar ini semua jenis pariah.

      Delete
  10. The ISIS was after Syrian militant turncoats who carried out mass killings against their own people, before the U.S. intervened to back the Syrian militants. The beheaded men and heads displayed on fences are 17th Division Syrian Militants and not Christians as reported by dubious U.S./Jews propaganda blogs. The Christians was only told to convert or pay tax. The beheading, raping, Christian’s women, children’s and vitriol’s by Indian Christians are also false. http://youtu.be/AUjHb4C7b94

    ReplyDelete